|
In the opening paragraph of this volume of South African plays, David
Graver states that his goal is to keep American attention on South African
theatre "now that apartheid has passed" because of its "universal
lessons and appeal." Theatre enthusiasts should recognize a wealth
in South Africa of "hybrid dramatic forms" combining "African
and European" (also named as "industrialized and developing)"
aesthetic values, which are "rich in vivid language, forceful performance
styles and incisive social function" (p. 1). I can only imagine that this glossing over of these complicated and
controversial ideas may have been forced upon this otherwise respected
scholar by his publisher for marketing purposes. In rescuing what he
perceives to be America's flagging interest in South African theatre,
however, Graver does make a point worth considering. This is the idea
that it was not artists who faced a crisis of imagination after apartheid
(a debate which flourished in South African intellectual circles), but
audiences, particularly overseas audiences. He does not use this point,
however, to catalyze any substantial discussion on transnational processes
in South African theatre. Reading through the introduction, one wonders why Graver professes
interest in bringing South African plays to the attention of the West,
since he notes that certain plays, while important in a South African
context, lack an emotional impact that would make them seem "crude
and schematic" by "European standards of dramaturgy"
(p. 15). While his introduction discusses theatre of "social function",
such as township community theatre and workers' theatre, he pronounces
it lacking in "significant autonomous aesthetic appeal" (p.14)
for an anthology. Graver acknowledges a literary bias in this collection, bowing out
from including more community-oriented plays, or a community-oriented
analysis. Such perspectives, however, remain a vital part of the landscape
of South African theatre for the very reason that they address issues
of marginalization, gender equality, education, poverty, crime, and
cultural identity, all pressing issues in the wake of apartheid. Given
this, it is surprising and unfortunate that Graver would choose such
glib phrasing as "wife abuse has become a popular topic lately
in South Africa" (p.14). Although Graver's introduction covers far more ground than just the
scripts he has selected for the anthology, it is impossible in a twenty-page
introduction to do justice to the history and range of South African
theatre. It might have been more important, therefore, to focus on the
historical moment called "post-apartheid" and how the problematics
of this term are reflected in the plays he has selected. The historical
category, "post-apartheid," is a vexed one as the legal changes
that have been implemented have not significantly improved the material
lives of the majority of South Africans. By including plays that were
written during the height of resistance to apartheid, the implication
is that Graver views post-apartheid as an imaginative category rather
than one that corresponds to reality. However, he does not follow through
on this point. Instead he focuses on a "rainbow nation" definition
of "post-apartheid" by insuring a representative "sampling"
of plays, from "Afrikaner, Anglo, African, and Indian communities"
(p.19). Moreover, the limited analysis he gives revolves around the
rather reductive themes he names as belonging to this era of "post-apartheid
theatre," namely: "the recovery of the past; abiding social
injustices; and hybrid theatrical forms" (p. 7). Such broad, general
categories could be applied to any number of South African theatre works,
from those created in opposition to apartheid to those created during
its crumbling and aftermath, no less than to the theatre of several
other nations. However, it might have been even more suitable to the goals of a volume
of plays from the "new" South Africa to include more recent
examples of "post-election theatre" that are at least historically
congruent with what is really new, namely the adoption of a democratic
constitution. It would also have been gratifying to see more plays given
first-time publication, works that have not already had much academic
discourse surrounding them. Examples of such plays might include, Mike
van Graan's "Dinner Talk" (1996), which could be considered
as a formal opening of the discussion on "post-apartheid"
issues; Craig Coetzee's tour-de-force, "White Men With Weapons"
(1996), or the memorable community work, "Gomorrah" (1997).
Alternatively, with Graver's insistence on emphasizing the combined
European-ness and African-ness of South African theatre, and his concern
with appealing to the American audience, it might have been interesting,
for example, to include a play like "Good Woman of Sharkeville"
(1996), Janet Suzman and Gcina Mhlophe's restaging of Brecht's similarly
titled play. Stephanie Marlin-Curiel |