|
Three premises, though not new to most Africanists and Africans, are
the basis for Magnus O. Bassey's most recent work: 1) Current African
educational systems have colonial and missionary roots; 2) education
in Africa leads to elite status; 3) elites tend to protect the current
system. The author presents this book as "a critical analysis of
the behavior of African educated elites and argues that educated elites
in Africa have used their education and the schools to perpetuate their
dominance over their less fortunate countrymen and women" (p. 11).
In addition, Bassey proposes the adoption of a critical dialogical pedagogy
to address these current imbalances. With these goals set out in Chapter One, most readers, especially those
with an interest in African education, would expect a detailed study
of primary historical and current documents. However, a careful reading
of this work reveals no such analysis. While there are glimpses of specific
events and regions, "Africa" and "Africans" tend
to be the underlying analytic categories of this nine-chapter work.
With such a wide scope, perhaps it is no surprise to find a lack of
depth and very little continuity across chapters. Most chapters appear
to stand alone. Chapter Two begins with a focus upon general principles
of "Traditional African Education." Bassey utilizes secondary
philosophy and general education sources to posit that African systems
of education were egalitarian, complete and "relevant to the needs
of the individual and his or her society" (p. 24). The next three chapters document the general influence of Christian
Missions and colonial education policies. But there is little discussion
of how missionary systems interacted with the previously discussed forms
of African education, except to say that they undermined traditional
authority. The author outlines French, British, Portuguese, Belgian,
and German colonial educational policies in seven pages. All colonial
policies are then referred to as having certain features, including
domination, elite status, and inequity. Throughout these chapters, Bassey
makes reference to the "African neobourgeoisie [that have] prolonged
the life of colonialism inadvertently by talking so much of educational
changes and achieving very little in this direction and by sustaining
imperialism through neocolonialism" (p. 49). This section makes
very clear the central weakness in this work: Lack of scope and contextualization
lead to problematic overgeneralizations. There are marked contextual
differences between Nigeria, Tanzania, Ghana, and Zimbabwe that must
be recognized. When such differences are not taken into account, generalizations
across regions become much less tenable. Chapters Six and Seven explore the concept of power, inequality and
their general manifestations in African educational systems. Chapter
Six discusses the general atmosphere of African dictatorships that employ
coercive violence. Chapter Seven returns to the school setting to discuss
the issues of disempowerment, sexism, domination, and hegemony. A majority
of this chapter discusses the gender gaps in contemporary African education
and the attitudes contributing to their continuation. Throughout the
chapter, disempowered teachers and students are portrayed as helplessly
reproducing the structures of hegemony. In addition to a review of the
Frierian concept of "banking education," and Bernstein's "codes
of control," the author includes an overview of Bourdieu to show
how cultural capital leads towards maintenance of the status quo. Further
development of these frameworks with specific African examples would
greatly assist reader in this chapter. An in-depth treatment of Bourdieu's
conceptual framework might lead to a discussion of how powerful market
forces influence all members of a society, not only elites. Chapter Eight is a brief (five-page) general summary of the apartheid
educational system in South Africa. This chapter appears to be disconnected
from the rest of the work. No attempt is made to integrate the South
African example into previously discussed chapters. The concluding Chapter
Nine is a call for critical dialogical pedagogy to address current inequities
in African educational systems. Drawing upon Giroux, Friere, and Dewey,
Bassey concludes, "My answer is that we must use our schools for
psychic conversion of Africans in favor of economic investment, wealth
creation, entrepreneurial spirit, self-help and for creating wealth
for the nation" (p. 111). In order to do this, he states, formal
education must be reconceptualized to overcome its colonial heritage.
How this would be done in a specific context is not mentioned. To recognize
these important differences would probably contradict an underlying
central premise of this work: that one can actually speak of an "African
elite" and "African educational experience." Much more
detailed scholarship recognizing the complexity of African experience
will be necessary in order to achieve his laudable goal. This work appears to be largely inductive and aimed at a non-specialist
audience. What Bassey generally reiterates in this work is already painfully
clear to African specialists and citizens of African countries. Perhaps
most novel in Bassey's work is his stated intention to isolate and assign
blame to African elites for the current state of affairs. But this alone
is insufficient. A more thorough analysis would examine local needs
and levels of participation in one region's educational systems. Connections
could then be made to both historical roots and current political trends.
Only then could specific solutions be formulated. Indeed, the goal of
"harnessing the language of critique with the language of economic
empowerment" (p.113) is something to which most educational policy
planners worldwide would aspire. If Bassey's ultimate goal is to reorient
the elite focus of African educational systems, it remains unachieved. |